Only about 35% of people considered high risk by traditional cholesterol and blood pressure measures actually showed zero buildup on a more precise scan. Today starts there.
TODAY'S TOPIC: Heart and Cardiovascular Health
● CLAIM 1:
"A normal cholesterol panel means your arteries are not accumulating risky plaque."
VERDICT: MYTH
Cholesterol numbers dominate the conversation about heart risk, and it is easy to assume a good result means the arteries themselves are clear. A separate, more direct test tells a different story for a meaningful share of people.
A coronary artery calcium scan uses a CT scan to directly measure calcified plaque buildup in the heart's arteries, and it has been shown in large studies to identify risk that standard cholesterol and blood pressure numbers miss entirely. Some people with high LDL cholesterol score a zero on this scan, indicating genuinely low near-term risk, while others with unremarkable cholesterol numbers show meaningful plaque buildup.
The cholesterol panel is one piece of information. It is not the whole picture of what is actually happening inside your arteries.
Where the evidence splits:
● Why expensive shampoos can make hair loss worse?
After the warning about some popular shampoos, one thing's clear — your scalp needs special care.
Thousands say their hair feels thicker and stronger in just weeks.
● CLAIM 2:
"A resting heart rate that climbs gradually year over year, even while staying in a technically normal range, is worth paying attention to."
VERDICT: IT'S COMPLICATED
A resting heart rate within the standard range gets treated as automatically fine. The trend over time may carry more information than any single reading.
A resting heart rate that rises steadily over several years, even while remaining within a broadly normal range, has been associated in some research with declining cardiovascular fitness or early changes in heart function. This is not a diagnostic red flag on its own, and plenty of gradual increases reflect nothing more than aging or lower activity levels.
The number itself is not alarming. The direction it has been moving is worth mentioning at your next physical.
The research:
General cardiology guidance on resting heart rate trends as a fitness and risk indicator; the evidence on specific thresholds is still developing, so this is worth a direct conversation with your doctor rather than self-diagnosis.
● CLAIM 3:
"Women having a heart attack tend to wait longer before seeking emergency care than men do."
VERDICT: TRUTH
This delay costs real time during an event where minutes matter. Research on emergency response has documented the pattern consistently.
Women experiencing a heart attack are more likely to attribute their symptoms to something less serious, like anxiety or indigestion, and this contributes to documented delays in calling for emergency help compared to men experiencing the same event. Atypical symptom presentation, including fatigue, nausea, or jaw pain rather than classic chest pain, plays a significant role in this delay.
Trusting a symptom enough to act on it quickly is not a small detail during a heart attack. It is often the difference that matters most.
The research:
This pattern is well documented across emergency medicine literature on sex differences in cardiac symptom recognition and response time; consult a cardiologist or your healthcare provider for specifics relevant to your own risk profile.
|
THE BOTTOM LINE
Your heart risk does not always show up where you have been taught to look for it. A little more curiosity about the tests you have not been offered goes a long way.
