The old saying that you cannot teach an old dog new tricks has been directly tested against the evidence. It does not hold up.
TODAY'S TOPIC: Brain and Memory
● CLAIM 1:
"Adult brains lose the ability to form significant new neural connections, making learning fundamentally harder after a certain age."
VERDICT: MYTH
This idea has shaped how generations of people think about learning later in life, often as a reason not to bother trying something new. Decades of neuroscience research directly contradict it.
Neuroplasticity, the brain's capacity to form new neural connections in response to experience, continues throughout life rather than stopping after childhood. Adult neuroplasticity does tend to involve smaller-scale changes than the dramatic rewiring seen in young brains, and it generally requires focused, sustained attention rather than passive exposure, but the underlying mechanism remains active well into older age.
You genuinely can teach an old dog new tricks. It just takes more focused effort than it did at twenty.
Where the evidence splits:
● Her melatonin went 3mg to 5 to 10. She was still waking up at 3am.
Abigail was 57, and after menopause she had not slept through the night in three years.
Here is what nobody tells you about melatonin: the more you take, the more you need. Her mornings got worse. Her nights did not.
When she tried to stop, her body had forgotten how to sleep without it. Then a friend mentioned a 30-second cherry trick.
● CLAIM 2:
"Taking a short nap before tackling a difficult, creative problem can genuinely improve your ability to solve it afterward."
VERDICT: TRUTH
Napping tends to get filed under rest and recovery rather than active problem-solving support. Some research suggests it can function as the latter too.
Brief naps, particularly ones that include even light stages of sleep, have been associated in research with improved performance on tasks requiring creative or flexible thinking immediately afterward, likely related to how the brain consolidates and reorganizes information during rest. This effect appears distinct from simply feeling less tired, pointing instead to genuine cognitive reorganization happening during the nap itself.
The nap is not just recharging your energy. It may be quietly rearranging the problem in the background.
The research:
Research on napping and creative cognitive performance is documented in sleep and cognitive psychology literature examining the relationship between brief sleep periods and subsequent problem-solving tasks.
● CLAIM 3:
"Sharp swings in blood sugar after eating directly cause the specific mental fogginess people describe as brain fog."
VERDICT: IT'S COMPLICATED
Brain fog gets attributed to blood sugar swings frequently and confidently in casual health conversation. The direct causal chain is less firmly established than that confidence suggests.
Blood sugar fluctuations are genuinely linked to changes in mood, energy, and concentration, since the brain relies heavily on stable glucose supply for optimal function. However, brain fog is a broad, subjective symptom with many potential contributors, including sleep quality, hormonal shifts, stress, and hydration, making it difficult to isolate blood sugar as the sole or even primary cause in any individual case.
Blood sugar is a real piece of the puzzle. It is rarely the entire explanation on its own.
The research:
The relationship between glycemic variability and cognitive symptoms is an active area of research in metabolic and cognitive science, with multiple contributing factors typically involved in any individual's experience of brain fog.
|
THE BOTTOM LINE
Your brain remains more adaptable, and your symptoms more layered, than the tidy explanations circulating online usually suggest. Worth giving both more credit for complexity.

